Tuesday, Nov 19 2019
All Cities
Choose Your City
'Not to offend the jealous admirers of the Volga, but I have never in my life seen a river more splendid than the Yenisey'
A.P. Chekhov, 1890

America first populated in 'a single wave of migration from Siberia' no more than 23,000 years ago

By The Siberian Times reporter
22 July 2015

DNA research of Native Siberians and Native Americans revealed by Science and Nature journals.

Family Group Noatak Eskimos. Picture: Edward Curtis

Analysis of DNA of present day indigineous people throws new light on how our ancestors crossed the Bering land and ice bridge which then connected modern-day Chukotka and Alaska.

A study led by the Centre for GeoGenetics at the University of Copenhagen, asserts that there was one one initial migration from Siberia to America. 

Around 10,000 years later there was a split in these human ancestors into two groups, which anthropologists call  Amerindians (American Indians) and Athabascans (a native Alaskan people).

Previous research had suggested that Amerindian and Athabascan ancestors had crossed the strait independently.

'Our study presents the most comprehensive picture of the genetic prehistory of the Americas to date,' said Maanasa Raghavan, one of the study's lead authors.

'We show that all Native Americans, including the major sub-groups of Amerindians and Athabascans, descend from the same migration wave into the Americas.'

Beringia

Analysis of DNA of present day indigineous people throws new light on how our ancestors crossed the Bering land and ice bridge which then connected modern-day Chukotka and Alaska. Picture: Julie McMahon

The split into two main branches came about 13,000 years ago, coinciding with glacier melt and the opening of routes into the North American interior, according to researchers.

Another conclusion from the researchers is that given the earliest evidence for the presence of humans in the Americas dates to 15,000 years ago, the first ancestors may have remained in the land bridge of Beringia for about 8,000 years before their final push into the New World.

This is all distinct from later waves which gave rise to the Paleo-Eskimo and Inuit populations, and diversification from the single migration thrust only occurred once the ancient people were in the Americas.  

A second study indicates that some Amazonians descend from forefathers more closely related to the indigenous peoples of Australia, New Guinea and the Andaman Islands than present-day fellow Native Americans.

'Present-day groups in South America have a small but distinct genetic link to Australasians,' co-author Pontus Skoglund of the Harvard Medical School told AFP, speaking about  research published in Nature.

The news agency said this may explain a long-standing riddle: why, if Native Americans came from Eurasia, do some early American skeletons share traits with present-day Australasians?

But how and when this forefather came to the Americas remains 'an open question,' said the study.

Comments (8)

A must read is James Mitcener's novel for 29 weeks on the New York Times best sellers list
DD Schleicher, Fort Myers USA
03/02/2017 03:24
1
0
There's something that always comes to my mind when I read about this study. In one hand, the matter claims there was just one single wave into America coming from Siberia. In the other hand, they say there is "distinct genetic link to Australasians" in some present-day groups in South America. Correct me if I am not interpreting well, but is not that a contradiction?
Welder Oliveira, Goiania, GO, Brazil
27/07/2016 02:58
2
1
Pedra Furada in Brazil dates to 45,000 years ago and disproves the Beringia theory. How did Australasians arrive in South America? The answer is simple: via Antarctica, and the prevailing westerly winds and currents.
Jennifer Bibb, Richmond, Va. USA
15/08/2015 19:48
0
2
Excellent article! I lived in Russia for several years and got to so so man different peoples and cultures especially the Nanets people of the Russian Far East. You sure do see a resemblence to North American Indian peoples and cultures.
Szawica, Leavenworth, Washington State
25/07/2015 03:28
2
0
The conclusion puts a wrinkle in an old notion based on proximal geography. How DNA reaffirmed the idea went missing, but would be very informative. Another article about how this conclusion came to be confirmed may help to clarify the significance of the finding.
Harold Shaw, West Jordan, Utah, USA
23/07/2015 09:11
0
1
Seems like their lifestyle was same as Nomads back then.(like Mongolians)
Duke, Seattle,WA
23/07/2015 08:29
0
1
Sorry, I see that photographer was Edward Curtis, which means the photo was taken around 1900.
James Raymond, Las Vegas, NV, USA
23/07/2015 08:24
0
2
The photo of the Noatak Eskimos is superb. Who is the photographer and what were the circumstances of the photo? I used to work on the Noatak River and visited Noatak Village several times.
James Raymond, Las Vegas, NV, USA
23/07/2015 08:21
1
0
1

Add your comment

We welcome a healthy debate, but do not accept offensive or abusive comments. Please also read 'Siberian Times' Privacy Policy

Name

Town/Country

Add your comments

The views expressed in the comments above are those of our readers. 'Siberian Times' reserves the right to pre-moderate some comments.

Control code*

Type the code

* obligatory


News

Business

The Bank of Russia official exchange rates of foreign currencies
EUR70.53USD63.75GBP82.57Other...